It has been brought to
my attention many times, that there are preachers and teachers in the world who
don't recognize there are literal children of Satan surviving in the world
today. Since this is one of the central themes of the Bible, the fight for
supremacy between the children of Yahweh and the children of Lucifer, I wonder
what Bible these preachers and teachers are reading and studying.
In these studies we will be using the proper name of our God, which is Yahweh and Yahshua for Christ. For documentation read, "Who Is Your God?”
The battle lines are
drawn by Yahweh in Genesis 3:15, where He states he is going to put
enmity between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent.
Let's start at the
beginning; of course Satan wasn't a serpent. The entity that deceived and
seduced Eve wasn't a scaly thing wriggling along on the ground. Serpent was
translated from the word nachash, which means enchanter or
magician. A fallen angel, still retaining a lot of his angelic powers, no
doubt could be very much of an enchanter or magician.
Lucifer's children, and I do mean children not just followers, through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their ancestor, until they attached a secondary meaning of serpent to the word nachash. In Genesis 3:1-3 Satan said to Eve, "Is it really true that Yahweh said, You can't eat of any tree in the garden?" As it reads in the Hebrew, Eve replied to Satan, "And the woman said unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden". Now I am going to switch to the King James translation and I will correct it as I go.
"Of the fruit of the
tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it,
neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Let's see what it actually said in the
Hebrew. Fruit is the Hebrew word pirchach, meaning progeny,
brood, children or descendants. Do you talk about the children of a
walnut tree or an apple tree? Of course you don't!
pirchach, of the descendants of the tree, which is in the midst of
the garden, Yahweh has said, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye
touch it". That word touch is the Hebrew word naga, which
is a more polite expression meaning, to have sexual intercourse with. Do you
need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse with an apple? Of course not,
it isn't that kind of a tree.
Yahweh had millions of
the pre Adamic, Asiatic and African people around. If He just wanted somebody
wide between the shoulders and narrow between the eyes to spade up the garden,
He had them. He didn't have to create a special being for that purpose.
Satan had been the
governor of this planet until he forfeited the right to this position by
rebellion. Yahweh sent Adam here and it is recorded in Luke chapter 3
that Adam was the son of Yahweh. It doesn't record that about any of these pre
Adamic people mentioned in Genesis chapter 1. Adam was the son of Yahweh
and Yahweh sent Adam here to take over by force, kick Satan out and govern this
planet. The trees in the Garden of Eden were the family trees of nations and
Adam and Eve weren't
supposed to intermingle with these people. If Negroes and Asiatics were all that
Yahweh wanted, He already had them. What He created was a different and separate
being who was to be a different sort of person, whom the Negroes and Asiatics
could never produce.
The Hebrew word
Awdawm, which we translate Adam, means of a rosy, fair complexion. Adam was the
first person of a specifically created new race. Adam and Eve were told not to
mongrelize their race with these per Adamic people that were in the world.
When you come to
Genesis 3:13, Yahweh has called Adam, Eve and Satan before Him to give an
accounting of their misdeeds. According to the King James Bible Eve said, "The
serpent beguiled me, and I did eat thereof". Here again is the Hebrew word
nachash, meaning enchanter. Then there is the use of the word
beguiled; the Hebrew word there is nawshaw, which means
Beguiled means no more
than deceived. Somebody who sells you some mining stock in a mine that doesn't
have any good ore in it, beguiles you. The word nawshaw means
seduced, not in any way or sense can it mean beguiled. "And Yahweh God
said unto the woman, what is this thou hast done? And the woman said, the
enchanter seduced me." This is what it says in the Hebrew and Cain was the
product of this seduction.
In reply in Genesis
3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I will put enmity between thee and the woman,
and between thy seed and her seed". The same word zehra was used for both
the seed of Satan and the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed;
there is no other meaning. It also could be used as grains of wheat but it is
used throughout the Bible as meaning the descendants of a person. Satan was to
have just as literal children in this world as Eve was to have. The same word
zehra is used for Satan's seed and Eve's seed.
The reply of the
churchianity preachers is usually to quote Genesis 4:1. "And Adam knew
his wife, and she conceived and bare Cain." Notice that what is not said
is more significant that what is said, the Bible nowhere says Adam begat Cain.
As you have read in the Old Testament, the monotonous regularity with which it
always says, and so and so begat whosis and whosis begat what's his name and
what's his name begat somebody else, and so on. It was important to know your
ancestry in those days, because you didn't get your citizenship for two box tops
and a dime. You got citizenship because your ancestors, for over twenty
generations, were Israelites and no other way.
So Adam knew his wife
and she conceived. I can tell you something and I can prove every bit of it by
witnesses. I went to a movie one night and the next morning the sun rose in the
east. I didn't say the one caused the other. I said two things happened, one
happened first and the other happened second. I never said they were cause and
effect. The Bible never says there was cause and effect here. If you want
further proof of this, go right on to Genesis chapter 5 where you will
find the list of Adam's descendants. Cain's name is nowhere to be found. Neither
Cain nor Abel is mentioned among the descendants of Adam.
If you say Abel might
have been omitted because he was probably killed before he left any descendants
of his own, we don't really know. However, this isn't true of Cain because the
Bible traces Cain's descendants for six generations, naming them right down the
line. Never once does it record that Cain was a descendant of Adam, never in any
way, shape, forms or manner. The first time it records that Adam begat a child
is Genesis 5:3. "And Adam lived 130 years, and begat a son in his own
likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth." This child Adam begat was
not named Cain it was named Seth.
The satanic bloodline
crept in through Cain, possibly earlier, among the pre Adamic people. There were
pre Adamic people who were not necessarily satanic. There were some pre Adamic
people into whom the satanic bloodline came, and there were even some of the
descendants of Adam who probably mongrelized. In fact, it is evident they did
mix their bloodline for the fact that those living around Noah were wiped out by
the flood. The Bible tells us that Noah was perfect in his ancestry, with no
mongrelization. He and his family were the ones in the area that were still pure
in their bloodlines.
This is why the flood wiped out the mongrelized Adamites around Noah. As I documented in "Noah's Flood Was Not Worldwide", this flood did not cover the whole earth as is falsely taught in the churches of today.
The pure descendants
of Adam multiplied and then you come to the fact of the satanic bloodline
getting in there. Remember, Yahweh had announced His purpose; He was going to
take back the world from Satan's domination. Yahweh was going to rule it
according to His purposes. He was going to rule it through His children,
through the pure descendants of Adam. What would be the obvious move on Satan's
part to thwart this plan? The obvious thing to do would be to mongrelize the
descendants of Adam, then he could sneer in Yahweh's face and say, "These are my
children but where are yours? All these have my blood in them." This is exactly
what Satan set out to do.
records, "The sons of God saw the daughters of men (Adam) that they were fair;
and they took them wives of all they chose". You don't get the full significance
of it in this translation, "the sons of God" (beni-ha-elohim, also means sons of
magistrates or mighty men of the earth and angels).
A double race mixing
took place here; both the rulers of the pre Adamic races and the fallen angels
took wives of the fair Adamic women. It is written with obvious disapproval. The
male descendants of Adam were not allowed, by Yahweh's law, to marry anybody but
the daughters descended from Adam. If they were marrying within their own racial
line in this instance, it couldn't have been spoken of with disapproval. So the
beni-ha-elohim are evidently those of the pre Adamic darker races and the
fallen angels who followed Satan into rebellion. Greater details of this event
are found in the book of Enoch.
Go on to Genesis
6:4 where it is speaking of the same subject, again it is botched up in the
King James Bible. "There were giants in the earth in those days, and also after
that when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men and they bare
children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men (enowsh) of
This is what it says
in the Hebrew. "There were nephilim (the fallen ones) in the earth in those
days." They were fallen angels. That is what the bible calls them in so many
places. Jude 1:6 records, "Angels who had not kept their first estate,"
who had fallen from heaven and from their former powers. "When the sons of God",
and again it’s the beni-ha-elohim, "came in unto the daughters of
Adam...” so it's the same thing.
Here we have the
spreading of the satanic bloodline. Genesis chapter 6 goes on to trace
many of these descendants of the fallen angels. You find that all through
Palestine, on both sides of the Jordan river, clear down through Mount Seir, the
rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea where Esau and his family lived,
all through this area there are these various people with the satanic blood in
There are two
different places, one in Isaiah the other in Ezekiel, where it speaks of what it
calls a king or a prince. In the one case it speaks of Babylon and the other
case of Tyre. Nevertheless it speaks of him in language, which could not
possibly apply, to anybody except Satan. Therefore this indicates that at some
time or other, Satan had incarnated in the form of these various kings, one king
of Babylon and one king of Tyre.
Don't think this is so
impossible because many times the Old Testament tells of these angels appearing
in very solid form. They came and talked with Abraham on several occasions, one
of them wrestled with Jacob almost all night.
Another of these
angels came when the people of Israel were about to cross the Jordan River and
take over Palestine. Joshua, making a scouting trip around his camp, saw this
armed man standing there in armor and with a sword and Joshua asked, "Are you
with us or for the enemy?" And the man said, "I am the captain of the hosts of
Let's take Isaiah
14:12-21 and note that these verses could not possibly apply to anyone
except to Satan himself. We will quote from the King James Bible. "How art thou
fallen from the heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to
the ground, which didst weaken the nations: for thou hast said in thine heart, I
will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will
sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north." Lucifer
then said, "I'm going to be the ruler over Israel (Yahweh's people). I will
ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High".
Yahweh our God then
told Lucifer the devil, "Yet thou shall be brought down to hell, to the sides of
the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee and consider thee
saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms?
That made the world a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof, that opened
not the house of his prisoners? All the kings of the nations, even all of them
lie in glory, every one in his own house; but thou art cast out of thy grave
like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust
through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcass
trodden under foot. Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou
hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people; the seed of evildoers shall never
You could not say this
about any kings of Babylon. The only one, who may possibly have failed to get
burial and an elaborate tomb, might have been Belshazzar. Belshazzar was nothing
but an incompetent drunkard and nobody ever could say of him that he was the one
who shook kingdoms and so on. He didn't even rule Babylon, because he was drunk
all the time.
These passages are
speaking of none other than Lucifer. Note how it goes on in Isaiah 14:21.
"Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they
do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities."
The word translated as children is from the Hebrew word Beni
meaning sons. Satan obviously was to have children who could be slaughtered,
to keep them from multiplying to the point where they would take over and rule
the world. Old Testament? Of course it is, now let's see what the New Testament
has to say about it.
Yahshua plainly says,
in a number of places, that the devil has children, not merely followers.
Remember the parable of the tares and the wheat. Yahshua spoke of the farmer who
sowed good seed in his field and his enemy came along during the nighttime and
sowed these poisonous weeds, the tares among the wheat. When the farmer's
servants saw the tares growing among the wheat they asked him if they should go
and pull them up now.
The farmer said, "No,
you might pull up some of the wheat with them. Let them grow together until the
time of the harvest, and then the reapers will first gather the tares into
bundles to be burned, and then put the wheat in my barn".
Then Yahshua explains
this parable to His disciples. In Matthew 13:38-39 Yahshua says, "The
field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom (the Greek
word used here in the plural is huios meaning sons, the good seed are the
sons of the kingdom); but the tares are the children (huios) of the
wicked one. Satan has just as true children in the world as does Yahweh.
Speaking to the
Pharisees, who as you know were Jews, Yahshua said in Matthew 12:34 (the
King James Bible botches this up to an extent that seems to me often to be
willful), "O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? for
out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh".
The word is not
generation at all. A generation is a number of people of not too
different an age, living at the same time. You, for example, constitute one
generation. Yahshua wasn't talking just about the people living then. They
weren't any more wicked than the generation that lived before them or the
generation that lived after them. What Yahshua said was, as we will paraphrase
it (it's the Greek word genema which means children or offspring):
"O children of vipers... sure all these centuries you Jews have used the serpent
as the emblem or symbol for your ancestor. All right, taking you at your word,
you children of serpents," right down the line they were vipers. Yahshua knew
who they were.
23:29-35 it is recorded, "Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
Because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchers of the
righteous, and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have
been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses
unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the
prophets." Here again is the Greek word huios. "Fill ye up then the
measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye genema (ye offspring, children) of
vipers. How can ye escape the damnation of hell? That upon you may come all the
righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the
blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom you slew between the temple and the
Was Yahshua so unjust
that He was going to punish these Jews for the murder of Abel, if they weren't
descendants of Cain? Of course not. Yahshua was tracing the children of
the serpent, the enchanter Satan, down through the centuries. Tracing
those who had murdered the righteous, including all the prophets, right down the
line. So Yahshua said, "Upon you (upon this race) these descendants of
the serpent, will come the responsibility for all the righteous blood shed upon
the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel even unto the blood of
Throughout the Bible
it records the two seed lines, Yahweh and Lucifer's. The Bible makes no
reference as to what your religious point of view may be; it is talking about
literal descendants. Romans 8:16 tells us, "The spirit itself bears
witness, that we are the children of God". The word children
there, the Greek word teknon, means one born a child, not adopted.
Nothing is more fallacious than this church doctrine about being
adopted children of Yahweh.
Read what Paul said on
this subject and nothing in it can justify the mistranslation of that as
adoption. Paul states that before the coming of Christ we were held in
bondage under the law. He then says the law just like an heir under age strictly
governed us. The heir has inherited from his father, who has died, all the
estate but he is still a minor and cannot take control of it.
The heir is under the
control of trustees and governors, appointed guardians, appointed by his father,
until he comes of age. Paul continues that all the time the heir is owner of it
all and yet he is controlled as though he is just a servant. You couldn't say
that about anybody who was adopted. If you take somebody else's illegitimate
child and decide you are going to adopt him, is he already the owner of your
property before you adopt him? Of course not, Paul wasn't stupid enough to think
he was. Only the churchmen are stupid enough for that.
What Paul was talking
about was the coming of age ceremony by which they marked the fact that
the heir had now become of full age and his property was put into his hands to
control as an adult. As I said before, Romans 8:16 tells us, "The Spirit
itself beareth witness with our spirit that we are the children of God",
teknon, one born a child, not adopted.
reads (Paul is quoting from Hosea 1:10), "And it shall come to pass, that
in the place where it is said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they
be called the children of the living God". It is the Greek word huioi,
meaning sons. We are the born, not adopted, children of Yahweh. As to the
born, not adopted or converted, children of the devil, read Acts
13:8-9. This tells about a Jew sorcerer Elymas, who opposed Paul when Paul
was trying to make some, converts. "Then Saul (who was also called Paul) filled
with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him and said, O full of sublimity and
mischief, thou son of the devil (the same Greek word huios,
meaning son), thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert
the right ways of the Lord?"
The offspring of a cat
is another cat, isn't it? The child of a Negro is a Negro and a child of Yahweh
is what? He is not as wise and not as powerful or important as his Father, but
nevertheless he partakes. Within his limitations, of a godly nature. This is
what the Bible tells us about and this is exactly why we of Yahweh's people
Israel are held to so much greater responsibility than other people. After all,
you can't expect a Negro to act like anything but a Negro, but a child of Yahweh
is expected to act like one.
The child of a devil
is what, another devil isn't he? John 6:70-71 is part of a very important
passage which began in this manner. Yahshua asked His disciples who were all
gathered together, "Whom do men say that I am? And they said, Oh some say that
you are this prophet or that one who has been reincarnated and come back here.
Then Christ said, Whom do you say that I am? And Peter spoke up and said, Thou
are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Christ then said, Blessed art thou
Simon, son of Jonah: because flesh and blood didn't tell you that fact: it was
My Father in heaven who told you that. And He said, Upon this rock (petra, the
solid bed rock of the earth) I will found my church."
Yahshua didn't say He
was going to found the church on Simon Peter (petros), a little stone. In Greek
petros means a little stone, just barely bigger than a pebble. Was Yahshua going
to found His church on a pebble that anybody could kick out from under it? No,
Yahshua said, "I will found it upon petra." the solid bedrock of the
Remember the example
Yahshua gave, the parable wherein He said one man had built his house on the
sand and when the storm came along, the flood washed the sand out from under it
and it collapsed. Another man built his house upon the rock (petra, bed rock)
and the storm beat upon it and couldn't do anything to it, because it was
founded on a rock (petra).
If any of you have
ever been to Yosemite Valley and have seen that enormous cliff El Capitan, you
have seen a good example of what the Greeks meant by the word petra. You could
build a castle on El Capitan and nothing could blow it off or wash it away. "So
upon this fact, that you have recognized who I am: the Christ, the Son of the
Living God; upon that I will found My church, and the gates of death shall not
prevail against it."
6:70-71 records, "Jesus
answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?
He spoke of Judas Escariot, (the son) of Simon, for he it was that would betray
Him, being one of the twelve". Our Savior was not just being vulgarly abusive by
calling people names He never did that. He denounced these Pharisees, He called
them hypocrites and they were. Yahshua wasn't abusing them with lying epithets,
they were hypocrites and He was accurate.
When Yahshua called
these Jews children of serpents, they acknowledged the statement was true, for
that was the emblem they had used from ancient times. When He said that one of
them was a devil, He wasn't being abusive, He was speaking the literal
The First Epistle of John again states the existence of these two seed lines. I John 2:29 tells us, "If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that does righteousness is born of Him". I John 3:2 continues, "Beloved, now are we the sons of God". Here we have the Greek word teknon meaning a born child, not adopted, thus a child born of Yahweh. Let's continue with I John 5:9-10."Whosoever is born of God does not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."
By this John didn't
mean that none of us commit any sins at all. If that were the case, we wouldn't
have needed the sacrifice of Yahshua on the cross. We all have our sins but
people are divided into two classes. There are the one who are only sorry
because they don't get a chance to sin more and the others who are sorry because
they have sinned only a little. What John means is, whoever is born of Yahweh
doesn't habitually sin. So John says in I John 3:10, "In this the
children (teknon) of God are manifest, and the children (teknon)
of the devil". Remember, John has talked about us as the born teknon of
Yahweh and the others as the born teknon of the devil.
records that as for those that are our brothers, not the children of Satan, we
should love them and not be as Cain. The King James Bible says, "...who was of
that wicked one and slew his brother." The people that have churchianity rather
than Christianity say, "Oh well, you know it doesn't say that he was a son, it
just means that Cain was morally associated with Satan and was bad and a
reprobate and so on."
There weren't two
separate Greek languages in those days. There wasn't one language to write the
Gospel according to Luke and a different one to write the First
Epistle of John. As you well know, different languages have their different
idioms. In many languages one word may have a meaning that can only be expressed
by a phrase of several English words. I think nearly all of you have a King
James translation of the Bible and you know that in most editions of it, some
words are printed in italics. Those words in italics are the words which the
translators added because they thought it was necessary to give the English the
same meaning the Hebrew or the Greek had, without these added words.
traces the genealogy of Yahshua, starting with Yahshua and going all the way
back to Adam. Let's start with Luke 3:23 as it is translated in the King
James Bible. "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as
was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli (the words
"the son" are in italics showing they were not in the Greek and the translators
added them), which was the son of Matthew (the son is in italics), which was the
son (italics) of Levi, which was the son (italics) of Melchi, which was the son
(italics) of Janna," and so forth. All "the son" were in italics so were
Some people would read
Luke 3:23-24 as follows: "...the son of Joseph, who was as big a
reprobate as Heli, who was morally no better than Matthew, who was as bad as
Levi..." Is this the way some people think Luke wrote this? If this is not the
meaning of the Greek here in Luke, it is not the meaning of the same Greek
phrase in John 3:12. So
where it says, "not as Cain who was of that wicked one", in Greek it means he
was the son of that wicked one.
In Greek, if you say
John was of William, in English it would read, John was the son of William. The
better English translations recognize this. For example in the Weymouth
translation, this same verse, John 3:12 reads, "We are not to resemble
Cain who was a child of the evil one and killed his brother."
Phillips' translation reads, "We are none of us to have the spirit of Cain who
was a son of the devil and murdered his brother." The New English Bible,
a magnificent job of translation reads, "Unlike Cain who was a child of
the evil one and murdered his brother".
The verses that people
use, as proof positive there isn't any basis for the belief that the Jews are
the descendants of Cain and therefore from the devil, is John 8:31-33.
Yahshua was talking to the Judeans who were the people we know of as Jews today.
It isn't simply that Yahshua was behaving like a petulant spoiled child because
somebody didn't believe in Him, because it says, "those Judeans who believed in
Him". Check Strong's Concordance, the word Jew is mistranslated from the word
meaning Judean. Yes so called converted children of the devil.
Yahshua said to these
Judeans (Jews), "If ye continue in My doctrines indeed, then ye shall be
My disciples; and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.
They answered Him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man".
Anybody that knows their Bible knows that all of Abraham's children had been in
bondage at one time or another. Here is evidence that these people weren't
descendants of Abraham. Who is it who could say he was descended from Abraham
and had never been in bondage to any man?
If these Jews were of
any of the twelve tribes of Israel at all, they would have been in bondage the
first time in Egypt. If they belonged to the ten tribed northerly kingdom of
Israel, they would have been in bondage the second time in Assyria. If they
belonged to the two tribed southern kingdom of Judah, they would have been in
bondage the second time in Babylon. Yet the Jews admitted they had never been in
bondage to any man, thus demonstrating they weren't of Israel or Judah.
Who could say that
1,800 years earlier that Abraham was one of his ancestors, Esau? Remember Esau
and Jacob were twin brothers, born with (presumably) the same bloodline.
However, Esau married two Canaanite women in violation of Yahweh's law. Esau
couldn't leave anything but mongrelized satanic descendants, because among these
Hittite Canaanites there was the satanic bloodline.
When the Bible records
Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of lentil stew, this isn't when
he lost his birthright. This was only a formal ceremony by which he gave up any
claim to it. Esau lost the birthright when he did the thing that rendered it
impossible for him to continue as the head of the clan.
from then on would be mongrelized. Recognizing he was already out of the line
for leadership, Esau sold his inheritance for a bowl of stew. The Bible records
that Esau and his two Canaanite wives moved down to Mount Seir, a very rugged
mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea. Mount Seir is exactly where some of
these people lived who were descendants of the fallen angels. Read Genesis
chapter 6, among the people who had the blood line of the fallen angels were
these Horites. They were the cave dwellers who were known as Horim.
Suppose a white man
married two Negresses here and then moved to the interior of the Congo. For the
next 18 centuries his descendants lived there with nobody they could marry
except the Negroes around them. Of course the last trace of white blood would
have vanished. Nevertheless, after 18 centuries they could still say they had a
These weren't Negroes,
they were satanic Canaanites, but the principle is the same. These Jews talking
with Yahshua had identified themselves as Edomite Jews. Genesis 36:20-30
lists Esau's descendants. Listed are all the various chieftains among the family
of Seir, the Horite satanic line, including his daughter Timna. Genesis
36:12 records that Timna was a concubine to Esau's son Eliphaz and bore him
a son Amalek. What a pestilential lot the whole tribe of Amalek was, they all
behaved according to their satanic bloodline. You will find a good deal about
this in Exodus 17:8-16 and Numbers 20:14-21.
This same satanic
conduct, on the part of the Edomites, was repeated as the opportunity arose.
Remember when the people of Israel came out of Egypt in the exodus, they wanted
to march up to Palestine, they were then attacked by the Edomites. The
Israelites were driven back so they had to detour around, down through the
wilderness, in the Sinai Peninsula.
When the Babylonians,
under Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem, they looted and burned the city and
massacred a lot of the inhabitants. Then the Edomites came rushing in to help in
the massacre and plunder. The whole book of Obadiah is just one continuous
condemnation of the Edomites for the way they acted. This book also predicted
their eventual slaughter and punishment for what they did. Obadiah verse
10 records, "For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover
thee, and thou shalt be cut off forever".
Obadiah verse 15 continues, "For the day of Yahweh is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head". Obadiah verse 18, "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; for there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for Yahweh has spoken it."
17:14-16 continues, "And
Yahweh said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in
the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from
under heaven. And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Yahweh Nissi
(Yahweh our banner). For he said, Because Yahweh hath sworn that Yahweh will
have war with Amalek from generation to generation."
How did these satanic,
mongrel, Edomite Jews get up there into Judea? They came in two principle waves.
During the time the southern kingdom of Judah was practically empty during the
Babylonian captivity, the Edomites were driven out of Mount Seir by a heavy
invasion by the Arab people, the Nabateans from the east. So the Edomites were
driven westward. They couldn't go southwest or straight west, they would then be
getting into Egyptian territory and they weren't strong enough to fight the
Egyptians. Consequently they went slightly northwest and took over the southerly
half of what had been the kingdom of Judah and settled there.
When the small remnant
of Judah came back from the Babylonian captivity, the books of Ezra and Nehemiah
record that 42,600, or something like that, came back. It lists them by their
families and when you run those down you find that slightly over 8,000 of these
people were not from any tribe of Israel or Judah. Only 34,000 of the 42,000
that came back were Israelites of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and a few
Levites among them.
Since they were too
few to drive out these numerous and warlike Edomites, all they could do was
settle in the little territory left vacant. To give you an idea of the size of
this territory, the entire area of the twelve tribed nation of Israel, before it
broke up, picture it as follows. If it were set down here in southern
California, it would extend from the Mexican border to the southern part of Los
Angeles and inland from the coast it was never more than 40 miles wide.
Now divide this into thirds, the northern two-thirds of that comprised the kingdom of Israel, the ten tribed northern kingdom. Only the southerly one-third of that was the kingdom of Judah. Of that one-third, take out the southern half of that now occupied by the Edomites. This little strip of land is all that remained for the true Judaites and Benjamenites to settle in.
Before the captivity,
the tribe of Judah had been in the south, the tribe of Benjamin in the north,
with the city of Jerusalem lying right on the boundary line between them. They
sorted themselves out as well as they could, the way they were before. Judah was
in the south and Benjamin pushed to the north. However, Benjamin couldn't just
move up to the north a little bit, because north of them was Samaria. Remember I
said you divide this twelve tribed territory into thirds, the middle third
Isaiah, Kings and
Chronicles record that when the Assyrians captured the northern kingdom of
Israel and deported its entire people, they brought other people from Assyria
and settled them in Samaria. It purposely failed to say the Assyrians settled
anybody in Galilee, the northern most portions, because they didn't, they left
it vacant. Now the Judahites pushed the Benjamenites to the north, as they
returned from the captivity. They couldn't just move up into Samaria that was
fully settled. So Benjamin had to leapfrog over Samaria to the vacant land of
Galilee, to the north.
In Galilee was
Yahshua's own hometown of Nazareth. He was born in Bethlehem, down close to
Jerusalem, but His family home was up in Nazareth. Remember, Yahshua got almost
all of His converts up in Galilee and of the twelve disciples only Judas was a
Jew. In Bible translations Judas is called Judas Iscariot. There is no such word
as Iscariot in any language known to man. This is a corruption of the Hebrew
word Ish Kerioth, meaning a man of Kerioth. Kerioth was a little village
in the southwestern portion of Judea, down in the territory occupied by the
Edomites. Judas was an Edomite Jew and the only Jew of the twelve disciples. The
other eleven were all Galileans, therefore Benjamenites. If a Jew could walk
with Yahshua for three years and still betray Him, is there any Jew we can
When Yahshua was
arrested and taken into the high priest's home for illegal questioning, Peter
followed Him in. The servant said "Well, you're one of them, you're a Galilean,
your accent shows it". You certainly don't have any trouble telling the
southerners from a northern Yankee here in this country do you. They speak
English with a different accent and the Galileans spoke the Aramaic of the day,
with a little different accent from the Judeans down around Jerusalem.
When the people were
gathered at Pentecost, and the Holy Spirit came upon the disciples, they were
all there except Judas Escariot. The disciples began speaking to this assembled
multitude in a multitude of different languages. How astonished the people were
when they heard the disciples speaking in all these different languages, which
obviously they didn't know. The people said, "Aren't these Galileans?" All the
remaining disciples were.
Down to the south of
what was left of the territory of Judah, these Edomite Jews settled. They were
always a pestiferous people and were constantly raiding the southern boundary of
Judea. Their descendants are raiding the Arab's territory the same way today. A
leopard doesn't change its spots. For a long time, after the return from the
Babylonian captivity, the people in Judea were a conquered province of one
empire or another, Syria, Egypt and finally Rome. They got their little flare up
of independence under the Maccabee kings beginning about 150 B.C. and about 120
John Hyrcanus, one of
the Maccabee kings, who had by that time a good disciplined army, got tired of
these Edomite Jew raids on his southern border. So, Hyrcanus marched down south
and defeated these Jews thoroughly. Saul, the first king of Israel, had been
told by Yahweh, "You go down there and absolutely exterminate these Edomites,
don't you leave one of them alive". Saul made a big mistake, as it is always a
mistake to disobey Yahweh's commands and instructions, he didn't exterminate
these loathsome people. When Saul came back the prophet Samuel said, "Because
you have disobeyed God, God has deposed you from being king, and He is going to
put a better man in your place".
years later, John Hyrcanus made the same mistake. After he had defeated the
Edomites, he then decided he was going to be a missionary; he would convert them
to the religion of Judaism. He offered the Edomites a choice; he would spare
them if they would accept the religion of Judaism. This was not the religion of
the Old Testament ever; it was what was brought back from Babylon with the
Babylonian Talmud. The late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise said it briefly and
accurately; I have never been able to improve on his words.
The learned Rabbi
said, "The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud
marked the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism". The people of the Old
Testament were real Hebrews and the religion Yahweh had given them could well be
called Hebrewism. This Talmud/Judaism began as the Jews destroyed the religion
of the Old Testament. In Yahshua's time they had not yet given it the name of
the Talmud, they called it "the tradition of the elders". Remember how often
Yahshua rebuked them for following their tradition. "Why have ye by your
tradition set aside the laws of Yahweh?" Yahshua was referring to the
So, John Hyrcanus was
going to be the Billy Graham of his day, he was going to make converts. Hyrcanus
told them, "If you will adopt the religion of Judaism, I will give you full
citizenship in the kingdom of Judea. If you don't, I will cut your throats". As
you well know, this is the most effective missionary technique that has ever
been developed. Even Billy Graham doesn't make converts that fast. Naturally the
converts made by the sword are of doubtful validity. So the Edomites adopted the
religion of Judaism and were accepted in full citizenship in the kingdom. You
will find this described in great detail in the one reliable history of that
period, Josephus in his history, "Antiquities of the Jews", book 13, chapter
The second wave of
Edomites came in when the Edomite chieftain Herod conquered and became king of
Judea, under the Roman Empire. Herod was a very able and very evil scoundrel. He
raised a large sum of money by taxation and by raiding his neighbors. With this
money he bribed Mark Anthony, who was over in Egypt with the Roman legions at
this time, to lend him a couple of the Roman legions to add to his own Edomite
troops, for the conquest of Judea. With the Roman troops and his own, Herod did
In 40 B.C. the Romans recognized Herod as governor with the title Ethnarch. In 37 B.C., Rome formally recognized Herod as the local king of Judea. He was still subject to Roman foreign policy but he had complete self-government at home. Herod had come in with a conquering army and his Jewish Edomite followers came in with him for the sake of the plunder they could get, they overran the area. They have also gone back to Germany for the same reason. You can learn much about these events in Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews" books 14-18.
In his other history,
the "Wars of the Jews", book 4 chapters 4-5, book 5 and chapter 6 and
thereafter, Josephus writes of the horrible conduct of these Edomite Jews within
the besieged city of Jerusalem while it was undergoing siege by Titus in the
year 70 A.D. Their robbery and massacre of the inhabitants inflicted probably
more casualties than the Roman army did. In the Jewish encyclopedia, the article
"Edom" (in the edition I used to look it up, it was Volume 5, page 41) the
article "Edom" concludes with these words: "The Edomites are found today in
These Edomites had come in the first time when John Hyrcanus gave them full citizenship. The second time they came in was as a wave of conquerors under Herod. This is the same Herod that tried to murder Yahshua as a baby. They had overrun the land. They had control of the entire civil and religious government until the death of Herod.
By will, Herod left
the kingdom of Judea to his son Herod Archelaus. The Romans were too wise to
trust somebody with the kingdom when they didn't know anything about him. The
Romans gave the new Herod a trial period as governor, under the title Ethnarch.
For ten years he gave the country the most miserable misrule that any nation
ever had. The people finally petitioned Rome to send a Roman to govern
The people didn't like the tyranny of Rome at all but conditions were so bad, anything was better than what they had. When a Roman would rather govern the people, you can understand how bad the situation was. The Romans put Herod Archelaus on trial, found him guilty of misrule and banished him to Vienne.
From that time on
there were a series of Roman governors called procurators, Pontius Pilate was
number 6 in that series. The military government was entirely in the
hands of the Roman procurators. They were also in full charge of the tax
collections for Rome.
On the other hand,
these Herodian Jews had control of the entire religious government and the
temple. They also had control of the civil government, in all respects
concerning purely local self government, could collect their own taxes and so
When the priests were
getting greatly upset about Yahshua's teachings they said, "If we let Him alone,
all men will believe on Him. The Romans will take this kingdom away from us."
The way the clergymen have taught it, this is meaningless stupidity. The clergy
picture Yahshua as a whining, cringing milksop, going around whimpering to
people they ought to be good. If this was all Yahshua did, these Jews would not
have bothered with contempt for Him, much less worry about His teachings.
Yahshua was explaining to the people the utter evil of the Jewish economic and religious system under which they were living. Let's paraphrase what the Jews might have said, based on what is recorded in the Bible. "Look, if we let Him alone, He is going to awaken the people to these controls we have over them. They will petition Rome just as they did about Herod Archelaus and the Romans will kick us out of here. We will lose control of the money and might have to pay fair wages. The people might rebel against the usury we charge them for use of their own money." This is what they were talking about.
Here were these
Edomite Jews, who told Yahshua they were descendants of Abraham. However, they
revealed they really couldn't be true Israel when they said they had never been
in captivity to any man. They might have had some Israelite ancestors but, no
alien blood was allowed in those called Israel. As we read in John
8:31-44, we will come to the place where Yahshua tells these Jews they were
the children of the devil. They would do the lusts of their father who was a
murderer from the beginning.
Yahshua recognized the
two seed lines. He didn't say these Jews had only adopted some of the bad
principles of the devil, He said they were the children of the devil. The
Old Testament as well as the New Testament recognizes the two seed lines. The
Adamic seed line, Yahweh's children, came down through a carefully selected best
one in each generation from Abraham, Isaac, Israel, then on down through the
twelve tribes of Israel. So there are the two seed lines, that of Yahweh's
children through Israel and the children of Satan, some of the most pestiferous
of which have come through the line of Cain.
People have asked me
if I thought the Jews know of their descent from Cain. They certainly do, and
here is how they proved they know. The Jews have given the owner of the radio
station on which I broadcast, a very bad time. As some of you may know, a
radio-broadcasting station license is good for only three years. If it is
renewed on a regular basis, you have a going money making business of
considerable value. If the license isn't renewed, all you have is some used
equipment. It makes a great deal of difference to the owner whether he gets his
license renewed or not.
The Jews put pressure on this radio station owner to put two programs off the air. One of the programs was Richard Cotten, a conservative commentator and the other program was mine. Much to the owner's credit, he refused to take us off the air. His reply to the Jews was, "I have no authority to censor any of these programs, besides, this is the United States of America and I believe in free speech." They told him, "You've got to put these programs off the air." The owner of the station answered them, "If either one of them has said anything that you think is untrue, although they are paying for their time, I will give you an equal amount of free time for you to answer them."
the Jews didn't take the station owner up on his offer. Neither Richard Cotten
nor I go off the deep end with any statement we can't prove. The Jews still
insisted the station owner put us off the air. When he refused, the Jews filed
objections to the renewal of his radio station license, which came up for
renewal about this time. They kept the matter before the Federal Communications
Commission for more than a year so the owner operated his station on a day to
day basis, not knowing if his license would be renewed or not.
During this time the
Jews terrorized the station owner into to making an agreement. The agreement was
the station owner would hire a Jew who would censor my program and Richard
Cotten's. This Jew could cut out whatever material the Jews objected to.
I have never sent any
cut and spliced tapes to the radio station. When I am paying $100.00 an hour for
broadcast time, tape is the cheapest thing you use. While I have never known of
one of my splices to come apart, I don't take any chances on it. The tapes I
send in for broadcast are complete, without splices. When these tapes are
returned to me, they are cut and spliced in a number of places where this Jew
censor has cut portions of them out.
I don't like a Jew, to
remove matters of essential Christian doctrine, can censor it one bit that a
Christian broadcast. However, this station owner doesn't have to carry my
program. The owner of the station still has to fight the Jews and this is three
years later. He finally won before the Federal Communications Commission. The
Jews appealed to the U.S. District Court of Appeals and the station owner won
there also. The Jews then appealed to the Supreme Court. This radio station
owner undoubtedly has spent somewhere between $50,000 and $100,000 in legal
expenses fighting to retain his radio station license and indirectly to preserve
my right of free speech. If I make myself too troublesome to him, he may just
decide he doesn't want to carry my program any further so I don't argue with him
On one of my broadcast
tapes, I quoted the Bible verses telling that after Cain killed Abel, Cain had
been a farmer up to that time, Yahweh said, "Cursed is the ground for your sake.
I will not hereafter yield you its strength." Cain's reply was, "My punishment
is greater than I can bear. You have driven me off the face of the land, and
I'll be a wanderer and a vagabond." Then I went on to say that I suppose you
have noticed that the children of Cain are not farmers today. You find
them in financial and money lending institutions. I didn't use the forbidden
word Jew, I just said the children of Cain. Guess what the Jew censor cut
out of my tape! As a Jew he knew exactly whom I was talking about. Yes, they
know who they are.
The Bible records Cain
saying he was being driven out of the land where the descendants of Adam would
be. He complained that wherever he went, whomever he met would kill him. In
those days there were a lot of places that weren't too hospitable to strangers.
If, as the preachers teach, Adam and Eve were the parents of the only people on
earth who were these other people? The only other child of Adam and Eve, at this
time, was Abel and he was dead.
With Cain driven away
from Adam and Eve, out into some other part of the earth, who was Cain going to
meet that would kill him? Remember, the Bible records Cain very speedily found
enough people that with them he built a city. The Bible records these pre
Adamite people. Yahweh told Cain He would put a mark on him so the people would
recognize him and not kill him. Just what was that mark? Did Yahweh tattoo
something on the sole of Cain's foot or where Cain would sit down on it? No,
long before any hidden mark could possibly be seen, Cain would have been
Yahweh had to put this
mark where it was the first thing others would see, He put it in the exact
geometrical center of Cain's face. This big Jew nose they have borne ever since,
as the sculptured monuments of the ancient empires show.
The ancient kings were extremely vain of the conquests they had made. The pharaohs of Egypt, kings of Babylon, Assyria, and Persia, all left elaborately carved monuments telling how they had captured this city or that. They recorded the massacre of so many of its inhabitants and made slaves of the others, plus how much loot they took and so forth.
In addition to the
inscriptions, there was almost always a carved panel illustrating this, showing
some of the captives. Wherever any of these panels showed an Israelite, it is
invariably a straight nose, typical of what we would call an Anglo Saxon,
Scandinavian or Teutonic type of face. Where it shows these Canaanite people, it
is always a typical hook nosed Jew.